<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Down Under Geek &#187; Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://downundergeek.com/category/apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://downundergeek.com</link>
	<description>It&#039;s Good To Be The Geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 00:09:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Malware sneaking into Android market</title>
		<link>http://downundergeek.com/malware-sneaking-into-android-market/</link>
		<comments>http://downundergeek.com/malware-sneaking-into-android-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 00:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DownUnderGeek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andoid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://downundergeek.com/?p=124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Malware sneaking into Android market.
Thank&#8217;s to Google&#8217;s &#8220;open&#8221; application marketplace (ie: No review process, post what you like), already 1% of the Apps on there have been detected as having Malware included in them &#8211; including several that were posing as Bank Apps and simply capturing your Bank details and sending them off to someone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.downloadsquad.com/2010/01/15/malware-sneaking-into-android-market/">Malware sneaking into Android market</a>.</p>
<p>Thank&#8217;s to Google&#8217;s &#8220;open&#8221; application marketplace (ie: No review process, post what you like), already 1% of the Apps on there have been detected as having Malware included in them &#8211; including several that were posing as Bank Apps and simply capturing your Bank details and sending them off to someone else.</p>
<p>The iTunes App store is a pain in the ass for developers for a reason &#8211; it stops assholes doing crap like this.</p>
<img src="http://downundergeek.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=124&type=feed" alt=" Malware sneaking into Android market"  title="Malware sneaking into Android market" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://downundergeek.com/malware-sneaking-into-android-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All touch screens not created equal. iPhone compared to Droid &amp; Nexus One</title>
		<link>http://downundergeek.com/all-touch-screens-not-created-equal-iphone-compared-to-droid-nexus-one/</link>
		<comments>http://downundergeek.com/all-touch-screens-not-created-equal-iphone-compared-to-droid-nexus-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 03:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DownUnderGeek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andoid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nexus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://downundergeek.com/?p=120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You probably don&#8217;t think about comparing the quality of a screen &#8211; it&#8217;s all about the size and number of pixels: Just like we compare digital cameras using megapixels.
Just shows that comparing basic specs and pricing is no match for comparing the experience of a device.
iPhone, Droid, Nexus One, and Eris capacitive touch screens compared [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You probably don&#8217;t think about comparing the quality of a screen &#8211; it&#8217;s all about the size and number of pixels: Just like we compare digital cameras using megapixels.</p>
<p>Just shows that comparing basic specs and pricing is no match for comparing the experience of a device.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/iPhone-touch-screen-rox-6542645?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+9To5Mac-MacAllDay+%289+to+5+Mac+-+Apple+Intelligence%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader">iPhone, Droid, Nexus One, and Eris capacitive touch screens compared | 9 to 5 Mac</a>.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="400" height="300" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=8569827&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="300" src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=8569827&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/8569827">DIY Touchscreen Analysis</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/motodevelopment">MOTO Development Group</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
<img src="http://downundergeek.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=120&type=feed" alt=" All touch screens not created equal. iPhone compared to Droid & Nexus One"  title="All touch screens not created equal. iPhone compared to Droid & Nexus One" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://downundergeek.com/all-touch-screens-not-created-equal-iphone-compared-to-droid-nexus-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting access to USA iTunes music store</title>
		<link>http://downundergeek.com/getting-access-to-usa-itunes-music-store/</link>
		<comments>http://downundergeek.com/getting-access-to-usa-itunes-music-store/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 01:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DownUnderGeek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pirate Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pirate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://downundergeek.com/blog/2006/01/24/getting-access-to-usa-itunes-music-store/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although the iTunes Music Store has been made available I have been looking for ages to find a way to purchase US iTunes content (especially the video stuff &#8211; big fan of Lost).
Unfortunately i am not lucky enough to know anyone in the states, or anyone with a US card. But i came across a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the iTunes Music Store has been made available I have been looking for ages to find a way to purchase US iTunes content (especially the video stuff &#8211; big fan of Lost).</p>
<p>Unfortunately i am not lucky enough to know anyone in the states, or anyone with a US card. But i came across a site that is selling US iTunes gift vouchers. Basically they email you an electronic US store voucher.</p>
<p>Tried it out and it works fine. Although you need to register a US account, which means you need a US address (but appears as though Apple dont care what address you use &#8211; ie just make one up).. but, you dont need to register a credit card (unlike the aussie store).</p>
<p>But, makes me wonder about the legality of it all? Aussie can not buy from t he US store without a US card&#8230; but.. if you get a US gift voucher.. then you can use it&#8230;?? Loop hole?</p>
<p>anyway.. for those who are interested&#8230; www.capsule-productions.com</p>
<img src="http://downundergeek.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=19&type=feed" alt=" Getting access to USA iTunes music store"  title="Getting access to USA iTunes music store" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://downundergeek.com/getting-access-to-usa-itunes-music-store/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mighty Mouse Review</title>
		<link>http://downundergeek.com/mighty-mouse-review/</link>
		<comments>http://downundergeek.com/mighty-mouse-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 01:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DownUnderGeek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mighty mouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://downundergeek.com/blog/2005/08/24/mighty-mouse-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well i have been using a Mighty Mouse as my &#8220;back-up&#8221; mouse for a few days.? ?
Not overly impressed so far.? ?
The tracking of the cursor is nice &#8211; nothing wrong there.? ?
The cord is definitely long enough &#8211; much more manageable around my laptop.  I mentioned previously that it had been reported as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well i have been using a Mighty Mouse as my &#8220;back-up&#8221; mouse for a few days.? ?</p>
<p>Not overly impressed so far.? ?</p>
<p>The tracking of the cursor is nice &#8211; nothing wrong there.? ?</p>
<p>The cord is definitely long enough &#8211; much more manageable around my laptop.  I mentioned previously that it had been reported as being too short but I think the length is fine.? ?</p>
<p>Not real happy with the nipple / track ball. Unless you drag more or less straight down and up, it misses your scrolling. I tend to drag top right to bottom left a bit &#8211; just the way I hold the mouse. So I find myself having to concentrate on scrolling. I suppose over time I will adjust.</p>
<p>The scrolling feels a bit rougher / jerkier than usual on XP. I look forward to testing it again on my iBook once its delivered.</p>
<p>The &#8220;squeeze buttons&#8221; on the side work well enough. On XP they default to &#8220;Back&#8221; which is good enough. Doesn&#8217;t seem to be any software or drivers to let you program it to do anything else.  The feel like they are in a funny place too – I keep having to reposition my fingers to use them.</p>
<p>The look of the Apple mouse has been described as either “clean, beautiful, stylish” or “bar of soap” – which I am pretty sure is not a term of endearment.  It does look nice and clean – but I think it loses some functionality to style.  That’s why we have ergonomic mice – they are easier to use.</p>
<p>Insert whiney comment here about lack of bluetooth option  Well everyone else complains about the no bluetooth option – I might as well.  It is a bit surprising.  Well not really – I am sure there is a Bluetooth option not too far away and we will all buy new mice again.</p>
<p>Bastards.  Clever – but bastards.  No one will point this out in a few months when Apple announce another massive profit for the quarter.  Slowing iPod sales were balanced by everyone buying not one mouse – but two !!</p>
<p>Overall &#8211; it feels a bit rushed. I know Apple wanted to release this with Tiger and there were some delays. To get it running on Tiger you must have either 10.2 or use the included software CD. That just seems strange &#8211; to have something as &#8220;basic&#8221; as a mouse needing a OS upgrade.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d give it 6/10. For $79 there are much better corded mice out there.</p>
<img src="http://downundergeek.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=16&type=feed" alt=" Mighty Mouse Review"  title="Mighty Mouse Review" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://downundergeek.com/mighty-mouse-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mighty Mouse a glimpse of 5th Generation Video iPods ?</title>
		<link>http://downundergeek.com/mighty-mouse-a-glimpse-of-5th-generation-video-ipods/</link>
		<comments>http://downundergeek.com/mighty-mouse-a-glimpse-of-5th-generation-video-ipods/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 01:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DownUnderGeek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mighty mouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://downundergeek.com/blog/2005/08/05/mighty-mouse-a-glimpse-of-5th-generation-video-ipods/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple have finally released a mouse with multiple buttons – the Mighty Mouse.  But is this mouse a glimpse of what might be around the corner for 5G video iPods?
http://www.apple.com/au/mightymouse/
The new Mighty Mouse (love the name) appears to look like a standard Apple Mouse with a small nipple on it.  However that “nipple” [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple have finally released a mouse with multiple buttons – the Mighty Mouse.  But is this mouse a glimpse of what might be around the corner for 5G video iPods?</p>
<p>http://www.apple.com/au/mightymouse/</p>
<p>The new Mighty Mouse (love the name) appears to look like a standard Apple Mouse with a small nipple on it.  However that “nipple” is in fact a mini track ball that lets the user scroll vertically, horizontally – in fact 360 degrees.</p>
<p>Instead of a distinctive left and right mouse button, the front of the mouse looks solid.  However it can detect if the left or right side of the mouse is being pressed.</p>
<p>The Mighty Mouse has a tiny tail.  As usual for Apple – Mighty Mouse has a fairly short USB cord.  But with Apple only just recently adding Bluetooth (and wireless) to all of its iBooks and Mac Mini’s – wouldn’t it make sense to have a Bluetooth mouse?  I guess that’s next month.</p>
<p>Reviews of the mouse have been a bit mixed.  I have yet to try one but many reports are saying its a little awkward to use – you must lift your left finger to use the right click.  The “Bar Of Soap” look and feel might seem nice – but using it is just not as nice as an “ergonomic” mouse.</p>
<p><strong>Video iPod Interface ?</strong></p>
<p>However I am wondering if the Mighty Mouse is a sign of a new interface for the rumoured 5th Generation of iPods?</p>
<p>Steve Jobs (the person who only recently said you only need one button on a mouse) has said he isn&#8217;t convinced people will want to watch videos on a small screen like the iPod.  I agree – it needs to be a bigger screen.  Not something as big as the Sony PSP as that would sacrifice convenience.  A landscape screen for watching videos would make sense.</p>
<p>Moving to a larger screen and keeping the same form factor obviously means a redesign of the touch wheel.  The current touch wheel is slightly bigger than the actual screen.  Some have even speculated it might be a touch screen interface.  That would be nice – perhaps even a segue for an Apple based PDA returning to the market?</p>
<p>But wouldn’t this new “nipple” trackball also be great for a minimal interface when coupled with a couple of buttons?  You could have a decent size screen on the current iPod if you just get ride of the scroll wheel.  Mighty Mouses’ trackball might be the key.</p>
<img src="http://downundergeek.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=14&type=feed" alt=" Mighty Mouse a glimpse of 5th Generation Video iPods ?"  title="Mighty Mouse a glimpse of 5th Generation Video iPods ?" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://downundergeek.com/mighty-mouse-a-glimpse-of-5th-generation-video-ipods/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dancing to Apple&#039;s iTune</title>
		<link>http://downundergeek.com/dancing-to-apples-itune/</link>
		<comments>http://downundergeek.com/dancing-to-apples-itune/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DownUnderGeek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcasting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://downundergeek.com/blog/2005/07/27/dancing-to-apples-itune/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The impact of Apple adding podcasting to iTunes 4.9 has been amazing.
http://www.apple.com/au/itunes/ http://www.apple.com/au/podcasting/
In one small product point release, they seem to have gone from one piece of the podcasting puzzle, to the only game in town.
Sensible, grown men, have been bending over backwards to reconfigure RSS feeds that worked perfectly fine only a few weeks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The impact of Apple adding podcasting to iTunes 4.9 has been amazing.</p>
<p>http://www.apple.com/au/itunes/ http://www.apple.com/au/podcasting/</p>
<p>In one small product point release, they seem to have gone from one piece of the podcasting puzzle, to the only game in town.</p>
<p>Sensible, grown men, have been bending over backwards to reconfigure RSS feeds that worked perfectly fine only a few weeks ago.  Podcasters have stopped calling for people to vote for them on Podcast Alley.  Almost instantly the only ladder that mattered was the iTunes ranking.</p>
<p>http://podcastalley.com/index.php</p>
<p>After encouraging listeners to download the podcasts using tools like iPodder Lemon and iPodderX – almost within a week the call went out to switch to the iTunes feed.  Please.  For the sake of the children !!!!</p>
<p>http://ipodder.sourceforge.net/index.php http://ipodderx.com/</p>
<p>All this fuss over something that has generally been received by existing podcasters, as a bit of a muffed launch.  I doubt there is anyone who thinks Apple got it right when they released 4.9.  It just reeks of a rushed job.  Unusual for them really.</p>
<p>No doubt iTunes 5.0 when its released (probably to coincide with 5th Generation iPods – RSN) there will be fixes and within 12 months all will be well and dandy.  All will be forgiven.</p>
<p>I tried iTunes 4.9 when it first came out. Unfortunately I was one of the many burnt badly by trying the shiny new toy when millions were also trying at the same time.  My experience was a pretty crap one – slow responses, missing links etc.  I know most of these things have been fixed, but I still like my iPodder Lemon software.</p>
<p>Maybe iTunes 5.0 will have me dancing a different tune?</p>
<img src="http://downundergeek.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=13&type=feed" alt=" Dancing to Apple&#039;s iTune"  title="Dancing to Apple&#039;s iTune" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://downundergeek.com/dancing-to-apples-itune/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why iTunes 4.9 ??</title>
		<link>http://downundergeek.com/why-itunes-49/</link>
		<comments>http://downundergeek.com/why-itunes-49/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 08:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DownUnderGeek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://downundergeek.com/blog/2005/07/21/why-itunes-49/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much anticipation was made of it in the podcasting community &#8211; people were excited they are going &#8220;prime time&#8221;. And scared what 35 million new users might do to their servers.
iTunes 4.9 would be the first iTunes to incorperate Podcasting subscriptions.
It was &#8211; A Big Deal. Steve told us it was so.
So why 4.9? Why [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much anticipation was made of it in the podcasting community &#8211; people were excited they are going &#8220;prime time&#8221;. And scared what 35 million new users might do to their servers.</p>
<p>iTunes 4.9 would be the first iTunes to incorperate Podcasting subscriptions.</p>
<p>It was &#8211; A Big Deal. Steve told us it was so.</p>
<p>So why 4.9? Why a simply point release? So close to 5.0 you might have thought an improvement this big might warrant a major update in the naming?</p>
<p>Did Apple know that 4.9 was really a &#8220;rough and ready&#8221; version that would cause the problems it has?</p>
<p>Is there a 5.0 version around the corner to coincide with fifth generation ipods?</p>
<p>Perhaps 5G iPods have some new shiny features that can only be accessed by iTunes 5.0?</p>
<p>Videos??FM Radio??Recorder?</p>
<p>hmmmmmm&#8230;.</p>
<img src="http://downundergeek.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=10&type=feed" alt=" Why iTunes 4.9 ??"  title="Why iTunes 4.9 ??" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://downundergeek.com/why-itunes-49/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Podcast Wishlist</title>
		<link>http://downundergeek.com/my-podcast-wishlist/</link>
		<comments>http://downundergeek.com/my-podcast-wishlist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 07:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DownUnderGeek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcasts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://downundergeek.com/blog/2005/07/21/my-podcast-wishlist/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The last few months I have discovered Podcasting and have been completely blown away by it. It&#8217;s fantastic. I&#8217;ll do a page of my favourite podcasts soon. Once we move house in a few weeks I am actually planning on making this website into a podcast.
However. There are some features I would like to see [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last few months I have discovered Podcasting and have been completely blown away by it. It&#8217;s fantastic. I&#8217;ll do a page of my favourite podcasts soon. Once we move house in a few weeks I am actually planning on making this website into a podcast.</p>
<p>However. There are some features I would like to see added to a podcasting client if anyone is listening:</p>
<p>1. Go Faster: Make it so I can increase the speed of playback. You adjust to listen just as well. I can do it in Windows Media Player, Quicktime &#8211; why can&#8217;t I do it in iTunes?</p>
<p>2. Chapters: I love podsafe music, mashups, werid-ass interviews. But sometimes I don&#8217;t care eouugh and I just want to skip ahead to the next bit. Let me do a &#8220;chapter skip&#8221; like I can on a DVD. I couldn&#8217;t that hard to press a button on your podcast software to mark a new chapter as you are recording. I&#8217;ve heard that in advance itune feeds you can have bookmarks. Haven&#8217;t looked at that yet so it might be the same thing.</p>
<p>3. Bit Torrent: Do I have to explain?</p>
<p>4. Links: I know I can get links &#8220;on the show notes&#8221;. Well doesn&#8217;t that defeat the purpose of RSS?? I subscribed to something so I don&#8217;t have to visit the site &#8211; now I have to visit the site&#8230; Even a simple link in iTunes somewhere so I can easilly get to the site without looking it up.</p>
<p>See &#8211; I don&#8217;t ask for much&#8230;</p>
<img src="http://downundergeek.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=9&type=feed" alt=" My Podcast Wishlist"  title="My Podcast Wishlist" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://downundergeek.com/my-podcast-wishlist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple and Intel</title>
		<link>http://downundergeek.com/apple-and-intel/</link>
		<comments>http://downundergeek.com/apple-and-intel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 02:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DownUnderGeek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://downundergeek.com/blog/2007/08/28/apple-and-intel/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you might know, a couple of weeks ago Apple announced that it will be moving from its current platform of IBM Power PC chips, to intel.
At first it seemed like a huge rumour that &#8220;leaked&#8221; a few days before the conference to generate some hype for it. Certainly no one was talking about it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you might know, a couple of weeks ago Apple announced that it will be moving from its current platform of IBM Power PC chips, to intel.</p>
<p>At first it seemed like a huge rumour that &#8220;leaked&#8221; a few days before the conference to generate some hype for it. Certainly no one was talking about it before CNet leaked the story, but for the next 3-4 days that&#8217;s all everyone talked about.</p>
<p>I was so intrigued about it happening I wandered into my office about 4am (keynote started at 3am local time here) to see if it was true. It was.</p>
<p>Overall I think it will be a great thing for Apple to do. Finally OSX will compete on level playing field with Windows machines. Yes Apple is a hardware company first &#8211; they make their money on selling boxes rather than copies of OSX (although the paid upgrade cycle doesn&#8217;t seem to hurt them).</p>
<p>But now they can sell the magic of OSX and the whole Apple experience without the burden of having to prove that a 1.5Ghz PPC is the same as a 2.5 Pentium 4.</p>
<p>In a one on one duel between Windows XP and Apple OSX &#8211; Windows is in all sorts of trouble.</p>
<img src="http://downundergeek.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=4&type=feed" alt=" Apple and Intel"  title="Apple and Intel" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://downundergeek.com/apple-and-intel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
